I said I'd never use these things again but I have to ask you what the heck is going on with Scottish-Terror and you continually blocking and demoting him - either talk with me off-wiki or via a chat or something.. or explain here if you want.. it's not right and I'm sure I'm not the only one that has an issue with this now.
if this is to do with that old feud or whatever just rethink it, please, because it's going to make you look worse and worse if you just keep blocking for no reason or very tiny reasons.
There was one day I got into hot water with B1 and/or AustinDR or rather both of them because I simply and plainly violated rules on this Wikia...but I did it by accident,honestly.
I talked to Mesektet and asked for help but I thought she is an admin and I overlooked the fact she isnt but she spoke with B1 who redirected her to AustinDR but he seems to be not interested or have some animosity towards me...I dont know what is it...I just wish to help this wiki with grammar...yes,I playfully poked a troll but I didnt know there will be such dire consequences
please help me to get back on this wikia with my original account
the fact is it has no bearing on villainy.. that's why we don't have race categories, nationality categories or sexuality categories.. truth be told we don't even need the "male" "female" or "genderless" categories but they exist anyway.. trans etc is just asking for trouble as it enforces stereotypes or brings politics into the wiki.
Austin demoted him after he asked to get demoted and he was blocked - his unblock was not done by admins on this wiki but rather by Misery with the quote "from off-wiki talk" - she also gave him back admin rights without permission.
thus his admin powers are gone as they were not legally given back anyway but rather randomly given by Misery and not by approval of others.
in other words he asked to be blocked and have his admin powers removed by his own words a while back.. his second return was not a "legal" return since Misery didn't have the right to make him an admin again without asking others.
Dosen't that include blocking Misery not Scottisch? Since she broken the law of giving another user Admin without other Admins agreeing on it? Like i don't see Terror making any mistakes here, except Misery making a huge move witch efected this into 'drama'. I apologize for saying that Misery should of been blocked but it just seemed like the obvious thing to do so.
And is Terror staying as a normal user? And is the trurth that he actually left the Admin rights by his own?
Second thing, why? I don't really understand what is the backstory of taking his rights in the first place? Could you explain that? And thank you for quick responding, it means a lot to just clean these dramas somehow. Drama is extremely bad.
Listen just wanted to apoligize for my thread earlier. Never meant to start anything its just alot of times I see comments from users who don't like the sites rules and I was just trying to help offer an alternitive for them as I got tired of seeing these comments. Sorry again.
that's fine but remember a lot of those users are disruptive for the sake of disruption - offering them alternatives is fine but a lot of them will continue to be disruptive regardless.. they have no chains forcing them to stay and their displeasure is their own fault in many ways for staying at a wiki they claim to dislike.
you're welcome to make your own wiki and offer it to them, I'm just saying that these users tend not to be worth the effort as they are usually not grateful no matter what you do (as is nature of internet).
it is original content and not plaigarised so I don't care, the whole "admin approval" thing is about sense to me.. if they just remake an article with stolen content it is an issue but if it is new content I don't see the need for admins to care.. that's my view on it, anyway.
the whole "check with admins before recreating ANY page" gets tiring when we regularly delete 100 plus pages a day, if the page is not vandalism, copy-paste or some horrendous mess I don't tend to care much on "admin approval".
he's been disqualified many times in the past because unlike Super Buu he is seen as a force of nature, so basically Kid Buu destroys because that's all he knows to do.. he is basically chaos incarnate.. like Destruction from DC, who destroys things because that's just what Destruction does.
Kid Buu has been argued to lack the moral choice thing required for Pure Evil (as in Pure Evil must understand good and evil but go on an evil path regardless, rejecting the idea of redemption).
according to sources, yes.. you're best as Austin about it though as he knows more on the trope (he works on the site that deals with Pure Evil / Complete Monster clean-up).. the problem with Buu is he has so many different forms and each one seems to have a different level of evil.
Geagalze wrote: Majin Buu = evil-doer or hostile species (considering all the variations Majin Buu has)?
he's not a species, he's a demon - "Majin" simply means demon in Japanese (more or less).. Dragon Ball villains all have multiple forms, Buu just had multiple personalities every time he absorbed a new form.
he's a single entity, much like a blob that absorbs others into itself (which he basically is).