I wish for admins to be aware of this, I think it is time we all started to think on ways to improve the "Psychopaths" category before it gets too out of hand.. because it is mishandled for many reasons ranging for general lack of knowledge to people not seeming to read the category well.
Hey there, I know that that page is locked for good reasons, so I'm just asking: Shouldn't there be at least one line in the article about Delphini, as The Cursed Child has been confirmed to be canon? I know that many fans don't consider Delphi canon (you and me included) as The Cursed Child is a stage play and not a novel, but shouldn't it at least be mentioned, like "In The Cursed Child, it's revealed that Voldemort and Bellatrix had a secret daughter called Delphini who planned to bring her father back" or something like that?
Alas, you are right, it is canon to my everlasting torment, and must be mentioned. See to it with other admins though, for I am retired and lack time to do so.
I do not reject it as canon for it is a stage play, but for it is a shameless cash grab working solely on nostalgia appeal and lazy fanservice, worse than the worst fanfic, who desecrates each character and aspect of the story in existence. I litteraly wept tears of blood upon reading this insult. Well, sorry for ranting.
I know this is gonna sound silly but I wondering if is it alright we could please change the names "Ultimecia" & "Adel" of the said (jpg/png) pics to their titles on what you have mentioned is really true, like with Count Dracula or Sorcerer Nakano in the Highlander films? If not, I'll understand.
What I mentioned is true, and yet is not. Her name is Ultimecia and everyone knows her as such, so renaming the pictures is possible, yet not necessary. What I meant is that "Sorceress" with a capital S is used as a title for all three witches of the story, including in their dialogue box. What I said is that since a nobility title is included in the full name, like indeed Count or King, so mentioning her full name should include the title
Not completely seperating. I think it keeps the two connected while keeping the extra pictures (over the limit of 20 images) in the article's subpage, the gallery page. I first finally realized it after I too many pics I added & placed onto my Cartmanland theme park, & asked myself, "will it hold the extra pics altogether? What if someone goes crazy & overboard when they do pictures spamming? What if the extra images added would mess up the loading process in the future or something?". & so, I decided to do something a bit different.
You know, what else should bit official? I don't think it should be big of a deal, I'm spitballing here. First category about the genre of the story, then the media, then the series, then the role, then the characteristics... This is an order you or someone (even an admin) with the same thought as you are quite attached to in your articles, then me or anybody (including an admin) do with the categories in their furnished articles (like me for for example,fires the role, second the media, third the genre).
I'm afrait it would only lead to nitpicking and edit war. To be fair, reorganizing the categories as I did was close to that. Perhaps, launching a discussion to define a order of categories, but you know as well as I do that such guidelines would be overlooked.
if they commit crimes they can count but if they are just boxers doing their jobs they are not valid, no matter how "heel" their actions are.. mean-spirited jerks are not valid until they commit actual crimes.
Ivo counts because he transcended simply being a sports rival and very much went into criminal territory (that and being a tool for Soviet superpowers, of that era.. making him (by the setting) a literal "evil mascot" designed to show off how superior the Soviet regime was (the Soviets were depicted as evil in these films, due to the setting and time period etc).