Can I have permission to rename Miss Heinous to Meteora Butterfly because that is her real name and I saw the SVTFOE wiki rename her to Meteora Butterfly.
Why did you add an article stub to the Momoshiki Ōtsutsuki/Gallery page? I thought stubs are for short articles with at least over a eight sentence or something. The page that you added the stub template on is a gallery page with over 20 images.
I don't what to tell you about that dude or his thing for removing the Plagiarism template. All I know is I've been betrayed again by the 3rd and final traitor this year, Thomas1516, & it made me to send a simple message to all who would think about sockpupetting "enough".
No. All of us admins got more cleanup to perform again this month after being attack by another sockpuppet troll named DarkraiDonjonMystere (aka LePokemon) again today. Plus the idea for this renaming is not sensible so it's out of the question. I'm sorry, sir.
B1bl1kal wrote: No. All of us admins got more cleanup to perform again this month after being attack by another sockpuppet troll named DarkraiDonjonMystere (aka LePokemon) again today. Plus the idea for this renaming is not sensible so it's out of the question. I'm sorry, sir.
okay. I just thought titles that define as the whole series would be better.
I do. Hell I soon found out on YouTube like a couple months ago the chick Brandy is Ash's kid which puts into an ongoing war against the undead forces of evil as $hit gets interesting, yet leads to a simple question for everyone including those in high school & marriage, "how the hell some crazy lovin'/sex could lead to a kid?".
B1bl1kal wrote: I do. Hell I soon found out on YouTube like a couple months ago the chick Brandy is Ash's kid which puts into an ongoing war against the undead forces of evil as $hit gets interesting, yet leads to a simple question for everyone including those in high school & marriage, "how the hell some crazy lovin'/sex could lead to a kid?".
I am ready to meet Dark Ones making their glorious canonical debut in next episode "Judgement Day"! :)
Oh yeah the Kandarian Demon (better known as the "Evil Force"). We should add more pics of both it & the Dark Ones this weekend (let's say Thursday night). It'll be fun.
Promise you won't block me, I will be long gone and rarely active because I'm aware. I'll just gonna take a look at all pages here just don't block me.
Thank you, I am just too scared to create a page. From now on, I will no longer create pages. Thank yu by the way. I'm sure to support you for your job.
Just letting you know a user called AlexanderAndreiescu has been replacing info on articles with completely unrelated content and has continued to do so after being told to stop.
Hello. Regarding the page for "Zorack," the crazy bus driver from the Rocko's Modern Life episode I See London, I See France, this character is, as far as I'm aware, having seen the episode, never identified by name either on screen (such as a nametag), or in dialogue. He simply refers to himself as "your guide" and the end credits only identify him as "Driver." Unless whoever created the page or changed its name originally can provide some kind of source for the name "Zorack," I'm inclined to dismiss it as fanon.
He is also (or was) referred to by the slightly-different name of Zorack on the Rocko's Modern Life wiki, which also does not provide a source for the name. The same user appears to have edited both entries. The lack of consistency in the spelling despite the same guy changing it makes it fishier to me. I'm well aware plenty of characters have names only given in scripts and model sheets and other behind the scenes material, but I usually cite those. The user who made the change did not do this on either page.
Anyway, I figured I would alert an admin to this issue. Thanks. :)
hello, I'm relatively new here and since you are one of the most inportandes people of the wiki, I would like to do something in this wiki, create a new category, I'll tell you more in the chat...
I think it's better to scrap "Omnipotents" & merge the said category into "Essokinesis" & one of the 2 reason I think we should change it, that & the second reason of mine was because I have to remove the failed "Omnipotence" category for its limited number of places & items that fits the category.
we're working on a plan for "Reality Warpers" but restrict it to characters who can mess with reality on a planetary or above status, keeping elementals and whatnot for the lower-tier magicians, mutants and so on.. that way "Reality Warpers" can still be reserved for the higher-tier villains and not just every powerful big bad out there.
Wikification wrote: I wish you guys make your minds up about these categories already.
you try and take control of a wiki with 30K plus pages and then you can make snarky remarks, categories aren't going to be perfect and admins are human so we continually change as does the wiki.. you making smart remarks only hinders it.
also "Omnipotence" as a category was always a bad idea as the concept can never be confirmed without stretching canon, over-estimating feats or guesswork.. we had Reality Warpers before and it makes much more sense to rename the category as Reality Warpers and make clear rules on what that is.. since the whole "Omnipotent" thing is just a never-ending cycle of fans making snarky comments about how character X is stronger than character Y or how such and such is not truly all-powerful because of issue whatever showing weakness number x, y or z.. by changing it to Reality Warpers these people have no room to argue anymore and we also get more accurate results, since few characters can be 100 percent confirmed "omnipotent" but they can certainly be confirmed reality-warpers.
I didn't think that remark was snarky. There just doesn't seem to be much of a point to the constant changes. It seems to make things more confusing and can sometimes make past problems resurface. Just settle on something and leave as is. Otherwise admins will probably have to deal with more arguments in the future.
the thing is some old categories and so on are broken and NEED to be fixed as they were made in a different time with different standards, "Omnipotent" is definitely one of those cases.. I can see your argument for changes such as Pure Evil as that change seems more and more pointless looking at it as it is just "CM" with a name-change.. also changes are constant because the wiki is growing and growth means change.
the confusion is short-term and in the long-term it works for the majority - we don't change things unless we need to, the problem is that in the early days of this wiki we didn't think things through and now we have to fix the cracks.
that's why it seems like there's lots of "big" changes but in a wiki of 30k plus articles we actually impliment fewer changes than most.
change is confusing but it is far worse to just leave things "as they are" - if there wasn't a point we wouldn't be doing it.
we aren't removing Omnipotents, rather we've agreed to rename it "Reality Warpers" and have the new standard be (roughly)
"beings who can alter reality to a significant degree, ranging from planetary-scale alterations to near-godlike feats of reality-alteration such as those seen by Mad Jaspers etc - for lower-tier reality alteration see paranormal, magic or elemental (such as probability-alteration (Scarlet Witch types)"
that way it retains the purpose of being for powerful entities, just a better wording as none of the characters listed as "omnipotent" can really be "proven" as such - especially since stories can give or remove characters weaknesses and strengths as plot demands (for example comic books have Death and other "omnipotent" beings killed off all the time by new villains, just to show how powerful the new villain is.. defeating the whole purpose of "omnipotence").
Some people would argue that there was nothing wrong with some of those "broken" categories or don't want them merged with another category because of reasons. I've seen it happen all before and it just makes problems. But that's my opinion. Do as you wish. But from my experience, it just seems a bit pointless.
some would want us to stay the same, some would not - that's your opinion and this is ours.. that's how the world works and wikis are not democracies, they never have been, we're fair but we're not going to bend over backwards to appease everyone's point of view or we really would be in chaos.
I fail to see how renaming a category will bother anyone other than those who want to cling to the past or resist change or whatever, that's their choice.
they have to accept that they can't always have things their way and if they dislike the changes no one is forcing them to stay.. it's really that simple.
Also, the category is probably called "omnipotence" because it either represents truely omnipotence beings or something close to it; meaning it can be destroyed. It doesn't have to be exact.
Queen Misery wrote:
some would want us to stay the same, some would not - that's your opinion and this is ours.. that's how the world works and wikis are not democracies, they never have been, we're fair but we're not going to bend over backwards to appease everyone's point of view or we really would be in chaos.
I fail to see how renaming a category will bother anyone other than those who want to cling to the past or resist change or whatever, that's their choice.
they have to accept that they can't always have things their way and if they dislike the changes no one is forcing them to stay.. it's really that simple.
Well, like you said, it's my opinion, and I just felt like expressing it. Doesn't mean things have to change but think it should.
